In recent years, a new term has entered the workplace lexicon: “quiet quitting.” This phenomenon involves employees reducing their efforts to meet only the minimum requirements of their roles without formally resigning. The “quiet quitters” continue to collect a paycheck until they either leave or are terminated.
While some see this as a form of workplace protest or a pushback against burnout culture, employers are grappling with its impact on productivity and morale. This trend raises issues surrounding employee obligations, performance expectations, and employer responses in the context of Canadian employment law.
Understanding Quiet Quitting
Quiet quitting is more than disengagement; it is a response to overwork and burnout and has become especially prevalent in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Quiet quitting is rooted in several causes. These include toxic workplace cultures that encourage overwork, inadequate compensation, and a lack of career growth opportunities. Many employees feel that their efforts go unrecognized or unrewarded, leading to a sense of disillusionment with their roles. Additionally, a lack of opportunities for advancement or skill development creates a sense of frustration, making employees less inclined to go ‘above and beyond’.
Socioeconomic factors, such as stagnating wages in the face of rising costs of living, further exacerbate the situation, pushing employees to reassess the value of their time and effort. Moreover, the general trend of increased focus on mental health and well-being has led many workers to reject the traditional expectation of constant availability and prioritize their personal lives instead.
Employees embracing quiet quitting are often setting stricter boundaries, focusing only on their core tasks, avoiding extra duties, and rejecting unpaid overtime. The concept challenges traditional expectations about commitment and dedication in the workplace.
Under Canadian employment law, employees are expected to fulfill their “duty of fidelity,” which means that they must act in good faith towards their employer while performing their job duties. However, quiet quitting does not necessarily violate this duty, as employees still complete their assigned tasks and meet performance standards. The difficulty arises when employers feel these efforts fall below expected levels, especially if they believe that “going above and beyond” is part of the workplace culture.
According to Canadian law, employment obligations are generally defined by the employment contract or, in some cases, by workplace policies and unwritten expectations. An employee is not obligated to perform duties outside of those agreed upon in their contract, unless otherwise specified. This means that, legally, an employee is not required to volunteer for additional responsibilities unless these are explicitly part of the job description.
Employer Responses: Performance Management and Constructive Dismissal
Employers facing a “quiet quitter” situation may seek to address performance issues through feedback and performance management. However, they must be careful not to infringe upon an employee’s legal rights or create an environment that could be construed as hostile. For example, if an employer pressures an employee to take on additional, unpaid tasks or makes their job environment uncomfortable as a response to quiet quitting, it could give rise to a claim of constructive dismissal.
Constructive dismissal occurs when an employer fundamentally changes the terms or conditions of an employee’s job to the extent that they are effectively forced to resign. A sudden increase in responsibilities or expectation to perform outside of agreed terms without compensation could meet this threshold, depending on the specific circumstances. Courts may consider such actions a breach of the employment contract if they significantly alter the employee’s role.
Balancing Work Expectations and Employee Well-Being
While quiet quitting poses challenges, it also highlights the importance of setting clear job expectations and addressing workplace culture. Canadian employers can benefit from creating open dialogues about work-life balance and creating environments where employees feel valued without being overextended. Developing policies that clearly outline job expectations and reasonable workload boundaries can help prevent quiet quitting and support a healthier workplace.
-CL
Comments